Les Miserables – Movie Review


lesmizI saw a sneak preview of Les Miserables last night. My daughter, who works at the movie theater, had some inside scoop, so I, and a few friends, got to see it earlier than expected.

First, let me just tell you that I LOVE Les Miserables. LOVE IT! I read the book years ago, but it’s probably time for a re-read. I’ve seen the Broadway play seven times. (I think… that number might be higher— remember, I used to drink— a lot!) I’ve seen some stellar performances and some that, well, were not even close to adequate. So, while I am not a trained musical theater critic, I feel that I have some expertise where this show is concerned.

Let me just say at the outset that the movie was excellent and I think that for anyone who doesn’t have an intimate relationship with the show, as I do, it will not disappoint. I was not so much disappointed by the way the story translated to film as I was by some of the performances and the sound quality. My daughter suggests that I see it again in a theater equipped with something that has three letters, something that has “surround sound” quality, I cannot remember what it is— she says that in our movie theater that equipment exists in Theater #3. Perhaps I will have to do that. Because I was sorely disappointed in the sound quality. The musical numbers that soar on the stage (“One Day More”, for example) fell flat in the theater.

Now, to the performances. Listen, I get that “big” names “sell” a movie. I understand that Hugh Jackman has won any number of Tony Awards for his Broadway performances. I never saw “The Boy From Oz”, but I understand that he blew the doors off of that thing. But there is a huge difference between playing Peter Allen, who was, by and large, a cabaret singer, and pulling off one of the greatest roles ever written for musical theater: Jean Valjean. Part of the flaw in his performance was that he was sorely straining to hit the high notes. And these are the notes that literally bring the house down during a live performance of the show. Seriously. In addition, and I’m not sure whose choice this was, Jackman’s or the director’s (Tom Hooper), but I was disturbed by some of the phrasing, as well. In particular, when he is singing “Bring Him Home”, when he is asking God to save Marius, Valjean says, “He is only a boy.”, which is one of the most moving lines you will ever hear uttered on a stage. Ever. Jackman (or Hooper) chose to whisper it. It was all wrong. Valjean is pleading with God to save Marius. The importance of this line cannot be exaggerated. It’s heartbreaking. It’s huge. He whispered it. It got lost. Unforgivable.

The other distracting bit about Jackman’s performance I do have to blame on the director, as it’s his job, ultimately, to notice these things. As Valjean ages, his hair turns grey. There were later scenes where he is not as grey as in some of the earlier scenes. Are we supposed to believe that Jean Valjean was using Grecian Formula in 1832? Nitpicky? Perhaps. But, like I said, distracting. Something as simple as a lack of continuity in a big-budget film annoys me.

Russell Crowe as Javert? Not even close, ladies and gentlemen. Not even close. This role requires a big, booming baritone, which Mr. Crowe, for all of the things that he is — telephone ripper-outer extraordinaire comes to mind — he is not in possession of the required lower register. If he would have actually acted the part, which Hugh Jackman, vocal problems and phrasing notwithstanding, certainly did, I might be inclined to give him points for trying. He didn’t. His face never changed. I think he expected that the lyrics would speak for themselves. That works on a stage, not in a movie. Not in close-ups. He was a bit of a mess.

Samantha Barks gave a serviceable performance as Eponine. Nothing about her performance chafed, but neither did it soar. A talented musical theater professional can do great things with “On My Own” and “A Little Fall of Rain”. She did not do great things with either song, which is a shame because she can sing and act. There was something missing. I can’t put my finger on it exactly. Maybe it was the chemistry between her and Eddie Redmayne. I don’t know.

Speaking of Eddie Redmayne. Holy Guacamole! His was the standout male performance of the movie. I have never seen a better Marius. Never. Frankly, Marius is usually a little wishy-washy. He’s an important character, in that he is integral to the Valjean/Cosette plotline, the Eponine plotline, and the student revolt plotline, but usually I don’t pay much attention to him until he sings “Empty Chairs at Empty Tables”, which is one of my favorite songs in the show. It’s very short, though, and not difficult to sing. It’s designed to pull a heartstring or two, and whoever plays Marius usually manages to do just that while delivering it. (Joe Jonas being the exception— Good Lord, don’t even get me started on him!) I think part of the beauty of this film adaptation was in its ability to let the audience get to know Marius, which was done without adding much of anything. It was accomplished through camera work, not through the addition of dialogue. It was a pleasant surprise.

Eddie Redmayne’s female counterpart, in terms of best all-around female performance has to go to Anne Hathaway as Fantine. It would be very easy to overact while playing Fantine. Very easy. She did not. Her portrayal of Fantine was pitch-perfect, as was her voice. Phenomenal. I have never been so moved by “I Dreamed a Dream” in my life. Never. Breathtaking. Heartbreaking. Difficult to watch, even. She was, in a word, fantastic.

As an aside, I saw Daphne Rubin-Vega play Fantine once. The audience actually applauded when she died. Applauded. It was, far and away, one of the worst performances I have ever seen anyone deliver on a Broadway stage. Not only did she not have the vocal chops for the role, but she decided to imbue her already horrid performance with a Brooklyn accent. (Her own, maybe? I don’t know.) Worse is that nobody stopped her. It was just awful.

Amanda Seyfried was a pleasant surprise as the adult Cosette. This is another role that, while important in linking Valjean and Marius, makes me go, “Meh”. I’ll admit I thought that Seyfried might be a train wreck. I was wrong. Often I find Cosette’s soprano to be grating, but Seyfried pulled it off and in doing so showed the audience her vulnerability and her loneliness. She was very good.

No one who has ever seen the show doesn’t have a soft spot for Gavroche, the little urchin boy. Daniel Huttlestone plays him in the film. Gavroche is always a scene stealer. Huttlestone did not disappoint. He captured the combination of street smarts and innocence that makes this character so beloved just perfectly.

The Thernardier’s are the comic relief in what could otherwise be a dour enterprise. (It’s not called Les Miserables for nothing!) Hooper cast Sasha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter to play the innkeeper and his wife. I can’t really think of anyone else who would have played them better. Jack Black might have made a decent Thernardier, but Sasha Baron Cohen was very good. The costuming was as over-the-top as it should have been. Overall, they were fine. Their performances were probably better in “Sweeney Todd”, but they had more to work with in that movie adaptation. The Thernardier’s are, for all intents and purposes, caricatures.

One of my favorite things about the movie occurred very early on. Colm Wilkinson, who was the original Jean Valjean, was given the role of the priest who saves Valjean from being sent back to the gallows. He tasks him with giving his life to God. The priest only has eight or ten lines, but nobody else could have squeezed the emotion out of them like Wilkinson does. He turned in a beautiful performance that, frankly, made me all the more wistful for his Valjean. I am, in fact, right now listening to his rendition of “Bring Him Home”. Oh. My. God. If you want to be moved, truly moved, listen to this (pay careful attention to the “He’s only a boy line” while you’re at it!):

Here’s another version that should blow you away, as well (it’s Alfie Boe’s version):

Overall, I would recommend spending the $12 and 2-1/2 hours that the movie will set you back. It’s certainly far more worthwhile viewing than, say, “The Guilt Trip” or other such nonsense. Also, it’s okay to be a Hugh Jackman or a Russell Crowe fan, folks. It’s fine if you don’t share my opinion. For those of you with little or no access to live theater, use the movie version (but do ask about that surround sound thingy — I think it will make a difference) as a primer and then go on YouTube or some such to view these and other fine performances from this fabulous show! That’s all I’m saying.

19 thoughts on “Les Miserables – Movie Review

  1. […] Les Miserables – Movie Review (javaj240.wordpress.com) […]

    Like

  2. […] Les Miserables – Movie Review (javaj240.wordpress.com) […]

    Like

  3. Bailey says:

    Oh, my, poor Russel Crowe. He was, imho, awful. You know who could have done a better job? Anyone. My friend suggested Alan Rickman. Honestly, I think that it was just disrespectful to the audience that there were a hundred men who could have played Javert, but they needed a “big name.” I think they sold out, and I think it’s unfortunate that one of my all-time favorite musicals became so consumeristic.

    Like

  4. Ad-libb3d says:

    I almost didn’t read this, just because I’ve already heard some negative reviews and my youngest daughter adores this play and has been counting days off on the calendar until we can see it (we’ve already bought the tix for Christmas day). You’re so lucky to have gotten a sneak peak!

    Me = jealous. Thanks for the thorough take on it.

    Like

  5. peachyteachy says:

    Oh I want the movie to be good. So bad! I think that we just have to come to peace with the fact that Colm Wilkinson is the freaking reincarnation of Jean Valjean, with pipes. Fictional character, schmitional schmaracter.

    Like

  6. I very much am looking forward to seeing this despite its flaws. I have only seen it once in the theatre and it is such a moving musical. Why movie producers and directors continue to cast actors who cannot sing in musicals I’ll never understand.

    Like

    • javaj240 says:

      From my experience, casting the untalented, yet popular, begins in middle school and, if this version of Les Miz is any indication, continues ad nauseum. I recently went to a high school musical and was absolutely stunned at the number of untalented young men and women who were given principal roles when I knew, for a FACT, that some of the kids (and no mine was not among them…LOL) relegated to the chorus would have much better choices. It was ridiculous.

      The movie is, as I said, still a better choice than most of the stuff that’s playing today.

      Oh, Happy Birthday, by the way!

      Like

  7. javaj240 says:

    OMG…I will have to try to find that PBS thing. I don’t know how I missed knowing about it!

    Like I said, see the movie. Of course I want everyone to see the movie. I think what prompted me to write this was listening to people in the bathroom (always gotta go after the Giant Soda) gush over Jackman and Crowe… I was like, “Really????” They, admittedly, had never seen a live performance, nor were they familiar with any of the more famous Valjeans (I asked, LOL!)

    There are a lot of us Les Miz addicts out there.

    Like

  8. Totally looking forward to this. Not sure it will be our “Christmas Day” movie – the boys would never go for that – but I WILL see it! And yeah, I was thinking “Why is Russell Crowe in this movie?” LOL

    Like

    • javaj240 says:

      He didn’t ruin it, but he didn’t do anything to improve it. Ya know what I’m saying?

      Oh, and my nephew messaged me that he loved your son’s band… he wanted to know how the hell I had become familiar with a band from Ottawa. I told him that I get around. LOL.

      Like

      • You get around – too funny. You’re the best! And I totally know what you are saying about Russel Crowe. I’m so looking forward to this movie. Also Anna Karenina.

        Like

        • javaj240 says:

          I have seen previews of Anna Karenina and I’ll tell you it looks like it is going to be visually stunning. I actually watched the old Vivien Leigh version not too long ago after I had seen a preview of the new one and thought— wow… the new one is just going to be so much more visually compelling. I also really like Keira Knightly when she does period pieces. So, yeah, I’m looking forward to seeing that one, too.

          Like

  9. Nobody will ever sing that song better than Colm!! I watched the newest cast members on PBS the other night and they surprised the audience by bringing out Colm Wilkinson and the two Jean Valjeans that followed him. The four of them sang Bring Him Home together and I was a MESS!! I wish I had recorded it.

    I am anxious to see the movie, but from the snippets I have seen, I am not looking forward to watching Russell Crowe fall short. Thanks for the heads up….and you’re not alone….it is my favorite musical. 🙂

    Like

Tell Me What You Think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s